Our Mission Assistance Case Studies Press Room IPAO Forum
HOME : IPAO Forum
Please sign in:
Forgot Password
Register >
FORUM CATEGORIES
Commentaries on IP issues by experts from business, academia, science ...
The IP Climate is Changing - What You Should Know
Facing off with a university in court is something no inventor wants to ...
Ethics and technology transfer do not always go hand-in-hand. Share your...
Intellectual property polices may differ from actual practices at your u...






Laws and Litigation

Facing off with a university in court is something no inventor wants to do. Talk about your experiences or potential issues.

Search the Forum
 

What are the Costs When Academic Researchers are Isolated from Peers?

Dr. Stephen Badylak of Purdue University and Alan Spievack of Harvard University were independently researching the use of Extracellular Matrix (ECM) in tissue re-growth using similar, but not identical processes. While Badylak was working with human tissue regeneration, Spievack's research was for veterinary application.

 

Spievack met Badylak at a conference where the Purdue researcher was speaking. After their meeting, Spievack began working with tissue from a canine bladder and successfully healed a poison ivy outbreak on his own leg. Spievack shared his results with Badylak, but importantly, this was after Purdue had filed for a patent on Badylak's innovation and after the official date of Spievack's invention.

 

These dates are important because any communication between the two scientists had no effect on their inventions or the patents pertaining to them because these events had already occurred.

 

However, Purdue terminated Badylak without notice and filed a lawsuit against both researchers in conjunction with Cook Biotech, a company that had licensed Badylak's technology from Purdue.

 

The lawsuit sought nearly $2 million in damages and also demanded the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office add five Purdue researchers, including Badylak, to Spievack's patents.

 

Though the court rejected the university's charges, as is often the case, the suit cost Purdue hefty legal fees and the loss of a valuable researcher. Badylak moved on to the University of Pittsburgh where he continued his work in the Department of Surgery and Director of Tissue Engineering at the McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine.

 

But more important than legal fees is the concept that researchers must be cut off from one another or risk potential litigation. For the entire history of mankind, science has built on itself and today's modern researchers stand on the shoulders of the giants before them. Will innovation stagnate because academic inventors are prohibited from sharing their findings and collaborating in a healthy exchange of ideas for the betterment of mankind?

 

Reply to Topic

 
   

Comments

Comments : 2 - Last Post : Apr 20, 2009 12:04 PM by: shinton
re: What are the Costs When Academic Researchers are Isolated from Peers?
Posted by rowan32: Apr 20, 2009 11:17 AM

I completely agree with everything said. Academic research depends upon collaboration and publication. Discoveries build on discoveries. Research and innovation cannot occur in a vacuum. Academics should not be stifled by the fear of litigation by their university. How can we hope to rebuild our economy via research and innovation when it is not allowed to thrive? Hopefully this new Congress and President will take up this crucial task and allow our nation's inventors to concentrate on improving and saving lives.

re: What are the Costs When Academic Researchers are Isolated from Peers?
Posted by shinton: Apr 20, 2009 12:04 PM

Profit motivation should not stand in the way of scientists working together to make our world a better place. If the university was taken out of the equation altogether, it seems like it would be a better system. The funders of the research could still share in the profits with the inventor and the university, but left in the hands of the researcher, it seems like society and progress would be better served.

 
IP Advocate.org Copyright 2018
                 
 
 
 


You are about to leave IPAdvocate.org and go to an outside website.

IPAdvocate.org does not control any outside website and is not responsible

for content, performance or policies, including Privacy Policy.

Thank you for visiting IPAdvocate.org.