Our Mission Assistance Case Studies Press Room IPAO Forum
Please sign in:
Forgot Password
Register >
Commentaries on IP issues by experts from business, academia, science ...
The IP Climate is Changing - What You Should Know
Facing off with a university in court is something no inventor wants to ...
Ethics and technology transfer do not always go hand-in-hand. Share your...
Intellectual property polices may differ from actual practices at your u...

IP Policies and Your University

Intellectual property polices may differ from actual practices at your university. Discuss discrepancies and issues in this open forum.

Search the Forum

Patent Law Broken

Writing in the Wall Street Journal, Bruce Sewell, general counsel of Intel Corporation, says the patent system is broken, limiting research and tying up money and other resources in lawsuits.


"The U.S. patent system is beginning to show its age; outpaced by the swift evolution of technology and commerce, it increasingly favors speculators over innovators, impeding innovation and economic growth," he writes.


Read the full article here.


The increasingly litigious nature of the patent world is also having its impacts on college campuses, where researchers lack the patent law expertise needed to protect their intellectual property. Sometimes, when research leads to valuable new technologies, inventors find themselves fighting for their intellectual property rights in court, often against their own universities.


See IP Advocate's case study section for examples of how questionable university technology transfer tactics rob America's brightest researchers of the rights to their own work, often by dragging them into court where they are outmatched in expertise and legal funding.


Sewell notes that the number of patent lawsuits has nationwide nearly tripled between 1991 and 2004 and that the number grew nearly 20 percent between 2001 and 2005. Further, he notes that until 1990, only one patent damages award exceeded $100 million, while in the last five years at least four topped $500 million and one exceeded $1.5 billion.


"Unfortunately, under current law, parties that want to innovate in areas covered by questionable patents have only two options, both of them bad: an ineffective, rarely used re-examination process, or litigation -- the average cost of which is, by some estimates, $4.5 million. This impedes innovation, as the FTC noted: 'One firm's questionable patent may lead its competitor to forgo R&D in the areas that the patent improperly covers,'" Sewell went on to say.


Sewell calls on Congress to pass bipartisan patent "reform" to "improve the process for granting patents, and rebalance court rules and procedures to ensure fair treatment when patents wind up in litigation."


Reply to Topic



Comments : 3 - Last Post : Feb 27, 2009 8:06 AM by: bond_k
re: Patent Law Broken
Posted by clarkb: Feb 20, 2009 2:40 PM

I don't understand how this can be allowed to go on. Kudos for bringing this to light. Reform needs to be demanded.

re: Patent Law Broken
Posted by tregan: Feb 21, 2009 12:06 PM

Obama promised patent reform, so let's keep our finger's crossed that he fixes this mess...

re: Patent Law Broken
Posted by bond_k: Feb 27, 2009 8:06 AM

Obama may have promised patent reform, but the truth is the President has very little power without the Congress.  Congress helped get us into this mess with the passing of the Bayh-Dole act, and they need to work to reform current patent law as well. 


We need to let them know that we hold them accountable!  Meaning, that we will vote them out of office if they continue to do nothing; Democrat and Republican alike!

IP Advocate.org Copyright 2019

You are about to leave IPAdvocate.org and go to an outside website.

IPAdvocate.org does not control any outside website and is not responsible

for content, performance or policies, including Privacy Policy.

Thank you for visiting IPAdvocate.org.