Our Mission Assistance Case Studies Press Room IPAO Forum
HOME : IPAO Forum
Please sign in:
Forgot Password
Register >
FORUM CATEGORIES
Commentaries on IP issues by experts from business, academia, science ...
The IP Climate is Changing - What You Should Know
Facing off with a university in court is something no inventor wants to ...
Ethics and technology transfer do not always go hand-in-hand. Share your...
Intellectual property polices may differ from actual practices at your u...






IP Policies and Your University

Intellectual property polices may differ from actual practices at your university. Discuss discrepancies and issues in this open forum.

Search the Forum
 

In Academia, It’s Profits First

Janet Rae-Dupree reports in the New York Times that in less than 30 years, the American university research landscape has changed so dramatically that today "academia could be powered as much by a profit motive as by the psychic reward of new discovery."

 

Read the full story here.

 

Before passage of the Bayh-Dole Act in 1980, there were only a handful of tech transfer offices at universities nationwide. Today, there are nearly 300 and the number of university patents has grown a hundredfold.

 

In many cases, universities and researchers are ill-equipped to handle the rigors of the business world and, as the proliferation of tech transfer initiatives continues, those problems can only get worse.

 

"Professors are stepping away from laboratories and lecture halls to navigate the thicket of venture capital, business regulations and commercial competition," Rae-Dupree reports.

 

The report goes on to say that "swelling ranks of critics" are concerned that the Bayh-Dole act -- sponsored by former Senators Birch Bayh (D-Ind.) and Robert Dole (R-Kan.) -- may have forever changed the academic research landscape by making it more about dollars than about discovery.

 

"The primary concern is that its original intent -- to infuse the American marketplace with the fruits of academic innovation -- has also distorted the fundamental mission of universities," Rae-Dupree writes.

 

Universities, once the bastions of true science, are now all about money. This, the article says, may be stifling innovation as universities race to cash in on breakthrough technologies, rather than sharing their research for the greater good.

 

"In the past, discovery for its own sake provided academic motivation, but today's universities function more like corporate research laboratories. Rather than freely sharing techniques and results, researchers increasingly keep new findings under wraps to maintain a competitive edge. What used to be peer-reviewed is now proprietary. 'Share and share alike' has devolved into 'every laboratory for itself.'"

 

In at least one case, a university fired, and then sued one of its professors for being too open about his research with a colleague from another institution.

 

Stephen Badylak, a researcher for 25 years, found himself in court when the Purdue Research Foundation charged him with patent infringement for collaborating with Alan Spievack, a scientist at Harvard. The two were both working on tissue re-growth technologies.

 

Though Badylak and Spievack were evedntually cleared in court, the case shows how secrecy is preventing true academic collaboration. In this case, the two researchers shared their work without infringing on each other's patents, but the commercial interests of the university still provoked lawsuits.

 

The Times story warned that American universities have become obsessed with the business end of things at the expense of innovation.

 

"In trying to power the innovation economy, we have turned America's universities into cutthroat business competitors, zealously guarding the very innovations we so desperately want behind a hopelessly tangled web of patents and royalty licenses," the article says.

 

Reply to Topic

 
   

Comments

Comments : 4 - Last Post : Apr 20, 2009 2:51 PM by: ipadvocate
re: In Academia, It’s Profits First
Posted by clarkb: Feb 20, 2009 3:39 PM

It is really disturbing that a university would treat its researchers this way and would focus on profit above everything else. Good job for bringing this to light so everyone knows what is wrong with the system.

re: In Academia, It’s Profits First
Posted by tregan: Feb 21, 2009 1:02 PM

I just read the other day that Missouri is suing a professor, too. If universities were already being this "cut-throat", what are they going to be willing to do now that the economy is getting worse?

re: In Academia, It’s Profits First
Posted by mwilliams: Feb 27, 2009 9:02 AM

At this point there would seem to be no incentive to be a University researcher over a Corporate researcher.  Don't the Universities understand they could lose talented researchers if they keep behaving in this manner?

 

As far as suing a researcher for being to open... Discoveries are based on collaboration, how do we make that understood?

re: In Academia, It’s Profits First
Posted by ipadvocate: Apr 20, 2009 2:51 PM

I do not believe that universities are intentionally driving talent away, but suing professors or leaving intellectual property unexplored that may have societal value are definitely not tactics that encourage positive administration-professor relations. Researchers should absolutely be allowed to collaborate and discus theories and findings in order to further their research. If a university puts emphasis on profit before public good, the wrong message is being sent. The only way to make these points understood is for the public to demand intellectual property law and policy reform.

 
IP Advocate.org Copyright 2018
                 
 
 
 


You are about to leave IPAdvocate.org and go to an outside website.

IPAdvocate.org does not control any outside website and is not responsible

for content, performance or policies, including Privacy Policy.

Thank you for visiting IPAdvocate.org.