PAUSE | RESUME

In June 2011, the Supreme Court ruled on the case of Stanford v. Roche that, under federal law, faculty inventors do retain the rights to their inventions unless they specifically assign those rights to their university. The Court's decision clarified the intent of the Bayh-Dole Act, which set forth rules governing research performed using federal funding.

In response to the High Court decision, universities such as University of California/San Diego and the University of California/Davis, have required their faculty to sign "amendments" to their original employment contracts that would indisputably assign the rights to their current and future inventions to their university.

Experts in the field of intellectual property and technology transfer, including Dr. Gerald Barnett of the University of Washington, have written that these actions by the University of California are directly counter to the High Court's ruling and the intent of the Bayh-Dole Act. "This is an important law that govern federal agency interests in inventions made with their support," said Dr. Barnett. "However, university administrators have misinterpreted Bayh-Dole for years, by forcing assignment of inventions and therefore stripping university inventors of their rights. The Supreme Court flatly rejected this portrayal in Stanford v. Roche."

Dr. Renee Kaswan, founder of IP Advocate, adds; "Bayh-Dole freed university inventors from the compulsory ownership claims of federal agencies. Now, universities are making their own compulsory claims on all faculty inventions. IP Advocate aims to restore freedom to invent in universities, which is at the heart of Bayh-Dole and American university innovation."

Read "Sample Language for my UC Friends", where Dr. Barnett lays out seven points for faculty while exploring their options before signing anything. Read now>>

Also Read Dr. Barnett's Rev Proc 2007-47's Nonsensical Attack on Bayh-Dole


Congress officially passed the America Invents Act on September 8, 2011. This much anticipated legislation represents sweeping changes made for the first time in over a half-century that will impact the future of intellectual property, university research and independent inventor rights. IP Advocate opposed many of its provisions. However, we are now focused on educating faculty and student researchers on its new policies and procedures so you can protect your intellectual property today. We have devoted a special section that chronicles the Road to Patent Reform that features expert commentary, news and resources to keep our community informed.

Read Patent Reform to learn about the American Invents Act

Read the Special Edition of Medical Innovation & Business
Top Stories
The much ballyhooed and anticipated Bilski ruling was released from the high court today and the big loser... Read More
This lawsuit was brought by the ACLU alleging that the enforcement of the patents... Read More
Dr. Gerald Barnett dissects the Act and what it requires... Read More
Small business, manufacturers and universities align... Read More
Inventor rights at stake as MU sues leading professor... Read More
Featured Case Study
Delve into the controversy between the University of Missouri and its faculty scientist over ownership rights. Read More
EXPERT OPINIONS
HOT TOPICS
Registered Users:
IP Advocate.org Copyright 2018
                 
 
 
 
Our Mission Assistance Case Studies Press Room IPAO Forum


You are about to leave IPAdvocate.org and go to an outside website.

IPAdvocate.org does not control any outside website and is not responsible

for content, performance or policies, including Privacy Policy.

Thank you for visiting IPAdvocate.org.