Our Mission Assistance Case Studies Press Room IPAO Forum
HOME : Articles & Presentations : Whitepapers : Badylak Case Study
  Next >
Suppes Case Study

Townsend Case Study

Kaswan Case Study

Badylak Case Study

Emory Case Study

Táborský Case Study

Case Synopsis


Pioneers in the arena of tissue re-growth, Dr. Stephen Badylak at Purdue University and Dr. Alan Spievack at Harvard University were both researching and using the application of a composition known as extracellular matrix (ECM). Their research involved similar, but not identical processes. Dr. Badylak's work centered on human tissue regeneration, while Dr. Spievack's interests were in the veterinary arena, specifically for regenerating tissue in cases of skin wounds and surgery.

Dr. Badylak was abruptly dismissed by Purdue University, where he had taught and researched for over 25 years. Based on similarities between their work, the Purdue Research Foundation and Cook Biotech, a licensee of Purdue, sued Dr. Badylak, Dr. Spievack and Acell, a company founded by Spievack, accusing them of patent infringement. Purdue also sought to impede Dr. Spievack's patent applications based on his work by demanding that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office add Dr. Badylak and four other Purdue researchers to Spievack's patents.

Also of Interest...

The Ivory Tower and the Challenges
of Collaborative Research

University Researchers at Risk
for Patent Infringement?

University Sues Inventor of Retin-A

  Next >
IP Advocate.org Copyright 2019

You are about to leave IPAdvocate.org and go to an outside website.

IPAdvocate.org does not control any outside website and is not responsible

for content, performance or policies, including Privacy Policy.

Thank you for visiting IPAdvocate.org.